Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-05-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40, with an 82.5 score against 77.2. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is extremely older than the Motorola Edge 40, it's body is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 has a bit more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels amount in each inch of screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 has a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.