Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 overall score. The Galaxy A51 5G is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 40, we must highlight that it's also a older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have a display with the same size, the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a better resolution back facing camera and a much larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.