Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-04 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 global score. The Galaxy A52 is an a lot older, heavier and a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 40. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52. Both of them have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better number of pixels per inch of display and a same size screen. The Galaxy A52 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos and videos and a way tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy A52 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.