Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40's global score of 77.2. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is noticeably older, a little thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 40.
Galaxy A52 5G features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, a screen with the same size and a greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor and a way smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.