Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 40, with a 92.9 score against 77.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is way older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 40. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 40. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Motorola Edge 40 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a little higher pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and a much tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.