Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-05-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13. Galaxy Fold is an extremely older and a lot heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung made it just a little thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Motorola Edge 40, although the Galaxy Fold has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a larger aperture, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.