Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-05-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 40, with a 93.6 score against 77.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 40, we must highlight that it is also a notably older, a little bit thicker and heavier phone. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 40 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy S10 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.