Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 global score. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite is a better phone than Motorola Edge 40, we must note that it is also older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 40 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a little greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy S10 Lite takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with a lower resolution, a way smaller camera aperture and a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 2% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.