Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better phone than Motorola Edge 40, we must note that it's also much older, a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones come with the same Android 13 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Motorola Edge 40 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or videos in low light situations and a way tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting way worse quality photographs and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.