Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40, having a 77.8 score against 77.2. Galaxy S5 Sport is a incredibly older and somewhat thicker phone than Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
Motorola Edge 40 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a way larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 57% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.