Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 40, having an 81 score against 77.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a way older, much thicker and heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 40 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger sensor, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
The Motorola Edge 40 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 9% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.