Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 score. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is a little thinner than Motorola Edge 40, but it's a little heavier and was released 3 years before. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite smaller display, a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit worse pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40. They have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 33% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 40 features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a lot more MP back camera, a much larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.