Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Edge 40's overall score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is an extremely older and a little heavier phone than Motorola Edge 40, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse pixels quantity per inch of display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 40. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better low light images, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.