Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is just a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 40, although it's incredibly heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Edge 40 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations and a larger camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.