Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 2023-05-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the Motorola Edge 40, having a score of 87.9 against 77.2. Even being the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is an a lot older, thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40. These phones come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13.
Motorola Edge 40 features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and more brightness.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's memory to install games and applications is just as good as Motorola Edge 40's one, they have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier camera sensor and a lot tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a much more MP back facing camera. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.