Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, with an 81 score against 74.6. LG G7 ThinQ's body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, but it is just a bit lighter. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has Android 14.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ features more memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.