Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's score of 74.6. LG V35 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, but LG managed to make it a little thinner and a little lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. LG V35 ThinQ has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a really longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 16 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.