Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Alpha has a score of 76.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's overall score of 74.6. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Alpha has a newer 4.4.4 version while Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has Android 14, providing you a couple additional features and better performance. The Galaxy Alpha design is thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Alpha has a brighter display than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, although it has a little bit lower screen density, a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a way smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a camera that's very similar to the camera in Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, although the Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.