Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, with a global score of 98.9 against 74.6. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has Android 14. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is incredibly older, heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better display than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because it has a little larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a higher screen pixel density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because it has a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.