Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's general score of 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10e construction has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, but it is lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S10e features a much better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel quantity per display inch. The Galaxy S10e has a slightly better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Galaxy S10e shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.