Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is way better than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's score of 74.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, but it's a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because it has 8 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture. Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.