Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Forest Blue - PMMA; Hot Pink - Vegan Suede; Marshmallow Blue - Vegan Leather | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 1 Gen 6 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, getting an 83.3 score against 74.6. Galaxy S9 is an a lot older and a little thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit lighter anyway. Galaxy S9 features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a higher pixels number per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion features a better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S9 features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.