Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 82 score against 81.9. The iPhone XR is a notably older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 2 less cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant screen than iPhone XR, because it has a quite larger display, a lot brighter screen, a much better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a much better resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.