Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 overall score. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is a little thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is just a little heavier and was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount in each inch of display and a quite lower resolution of 1256 x 2760, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.