Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 81.9 against 80. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is notably newer, but heavier and a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760, a quite greater screen density and a larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way better resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.