Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a a bit heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but both have the same thickness. These devices have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, offering a couple additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a little bit larger display and a just a bit greater display pixel density. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.