Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 81.9 score against 81.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4, but it is a little heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little larger display, a little bit better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.