Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing the user some additional features. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a much newer and somewhat thinner device than the HTC One M9, although it's just a bit heavier.
HTC One M9 features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little sharper display than HTC One M9, because it has a bigger screen, a better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera in the back with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.