Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than HTC U11. The HTC U11 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a brighter display than HTC U11, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a really longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.