Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is a lot newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a quite lower pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger display and a much brighter screen. The LG G7 Fit has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger camera aperture, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.