Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. LG G8X ThinQ's design is a lot older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant display than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG G8X ThinQ features a superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has an 8% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.