Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is a lot older than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's design is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14, providing a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little lower pixel number in each screen inch and a quite lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a quite larger display. LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.