Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's overall score of 81.3. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is incredibly newer, but a little heavier and just a little thicker than the LG V35 ThinQ. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ features more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much higher 50 MP resolution camera and a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.