Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a global score of 87.6 against 81.9. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the LG V60 ThinQ is a notably older, notably heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each screen inch and a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V60 ThinQ features improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much worse 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot lower 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.