Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a global score of 87.1 against 81.9. LG Velvet's design is just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before. LG Velvet has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px. LG Velvet has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much larger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a more mega pixels back facing camera.
The LG Velvet's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery life in Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although the LG Velvet has just 4300mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.