Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a 91.2 score against 81.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also extremely older, much heavier and notably thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better looking screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density and a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. The LG Wing counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
LG Wing has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG Wing also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG Wing, because it has an 8% bigger battery size.
LG Wing features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the LG Wing also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.