Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a score of 85.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is older and extremely heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's body is still extremely thinner.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a more vivid display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a quite lower 1256 x 2760 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density and much more screen brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos in low-light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.