Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a noticeably newer device than Moto Z2 Force Edition, although it is way thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with much more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.