Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is incredibly newer than Moto Z2 Play's, but it's extremely thicker and heavier. The Moto Z2 Play has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bigger display. The Moto Z2 Play features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 44% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.