Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, having an 81.9 score against 79.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a a lot newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and lighter than the Motorola One Hyper. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. The Motorola One Hyper features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.