Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with an 81.9 score against 80.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is newer, a lot lighter and a little bit thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with higher video frame rates and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.