Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a score of 81.9 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is incredibly newer, lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the previous 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S features as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, both have the same internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor which gives a much lower image and video quality and a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.