Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than Galaxy A30, getting an 81.9 score against 79.6. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is notably newer than the Galaxy A30, it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better display than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a little bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a quite greater pixel density.
Galaxy A30 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A30, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.