Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30s, with a overall score of 81.9 against 79.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A30s's, but it's a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11, so it provides you lots of additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much higher 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a much greater pixels number per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A30s features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A30s counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.