Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 82 score against 81.9. Although the Galaxy A32 LTE Only is older and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's construction is still much lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a sharper display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a little bit higher screen pixel density and a lot brighter screen. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor and a much better video resolution.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has improved battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.