Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A40, with an 81.9 score against 79.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A40. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A40 has Android 11, so it gives a couple additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px. Samsung Galaxy A40 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 39% greater battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.