Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 global score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is incredibly newer than Galaxy A5 (2017), it's a little heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a quite higher pixel count in each inch of screen, a better 1256 x 2760px resolution and a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 44 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.