Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A50 is notably older than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's body is a little thinner and a bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a quite greater pixel density.
Galaxy A50 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.