Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a overall score of 86.6 against 81.9. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50s is much older than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's design is a little lighter and a little thinner.
Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a quite higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.