Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Galaxy A51 is a much older and just a little bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung could make it just a little thinner anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better camera than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.